Simply Streep's new video archive is mobile-friendly and plays your favorite video clips on all devices.

Steven Spielberg's new film starring Meryl Streep
and Tom Hanks hits US theaters on December 22 2017.
  June 24th, 2012       Posted by Frederik       Display Comments

This week we spotlight “The Manchurian Candidate”, Jonathan Demme’s remake of John Frankenheimer’s 1962 classic film. New DVD screencaptures have been added as well as new video clips – including a full making of and deleted scenes in the video archive. Production notes and my review can be found after the cut. As always, please share your thoughts on the film in the comments. Also, watch out for a special treat in the following update!

Production Notes

Based upon Richard Condon’s best-selling classic novel and an updated version of the 1962 classic by the same name, starring Frank Sinatra, Laurence Harvey & Angela Lansbury, this mesmerizing story of mind control and abuse of political power is directed by Academy Award -winning director Jonathan Demme, who draws a star-studded cast, including two-time Academy Award winners Denzel Washington and Meryl Streep andLiev Schreiber. “With the nation’s eye focused on a presidential election in 2004,” Demme says, “I couldn’t think of a better time to address darker themes about the political process and the forces that try to undermine it.” Producer Tina Sinatra couldn’t agree more, as did her legendary father, the late Frank Sinatra, who owned the rights to the original film. “In 1991, I asked my father what he thought of the idea to contemporize ‘The Manchurian Candidate’ and he said he thought it was smart and would have greater audience appeal today,” remembers Sinatra, who later obtained full rights to the story. “What’s most important to me is retaining the human stories that are so crucial to a film like this. The humanity of it is timeless, and updating the film’s battle to the Gulf War makes a lot of sense as well, especially considering how politically pertinent that part of the world is today.”

We may be seeing a lot more of “the real Meryl Streep” in certain subtle ways in this movie than we’ve ever seen before. She’s a very brilliant human being, and her character’s a very brilliant human being. I think in various other parts, it’s possible Meryl has needed to put a little governor on the extent to which she can allow her massive intelligence and confidence to show through; it’s a value Jodie Foster was able to capitalize on in ‘The Silence of the Lambs’. (Jonathan Demme, The Hollywood Reporter, June 2004)

Demme also notes that Senator Eleanor Shaw has been significantly updated into a more complex character. A calculating wife to the vice-presidential candidate in the book, the contemporary version of the character is an influential politician in her own right, as well as a manipulative mother pushing her son toward the vice presidency, and ultimately, the highest office in the land. “Ellie Shaw is a woman who adores her son and believes in him,” says Streep. “She’s also a mother who is achieving through her son the political position she feels has been denied her. So while Ellie grooms her son for leadership, she is also fulfilling her own destiny.” Demme enthusiastically concurs. “Meryl’s take on Ellie filled me with ideas and excitement,” the director recalls. “And I still ask myself: did I actually have the opportunity to work with Meryl Streep? The chance to collaborate with her is any director’s dream come true.”

Production Notes

As with most remakes, “The Manchurian Candidate” reminds you that there is a film in the past so good it should be revised. While the original is grounded in Communist conspiracy, the remake nicely transports Richard Condon’s 1959 novel to a modern-day election campaign, a setting more comprehensible for today’s audiences (and maybe too comprehensible for the film’s 2004 release). It didn’t lose the story’s vibe of paranoia and not being sure if this could all be grounded in reality, and works very well as a conventional thriller. The acting is fine as well. Denzel Washington and Liev Schreiber in the leading roles are surrounded by talented supporting actors, from Jon Voight to Kimberly Elise, Jeffrey Whright and Vera Farmiga. However, the updating of the Eleanor Shaw character from a dominant but subtle mother in the background to a power-hungry political person overshadowing everything and everybody didn’t transform that well for me. If you watch the original film, the Angela Lansbury performance developes slowly and becomes all the more deranged when her actions and motives are revealed. It’s a magnificent performance that should have won her the Academy Award, but even without it remains a classic performance in the 1960’s cinema. In the remake, I found the character unnecessarily schrill and over-the-top at times. There are good scenes as well, especially between Streep and Schreiber, but I was missing the subtleness that made this character in the original so inscrutable. I would say the 2004 remake is worth a recommendation, however, the original film is a must-see.

  • cida

    she’s excellent, ,,

  • Harry

    Meryl is superb as always. She is a pleasure to look at. The movie itself is also good. :)

  • pamh

    I agree with Sonja. I found the original version almost comic like while this version was more believable with the war as a backdrop, mind control and medical procedures. When Meryl’s character was conspiring with the guys from the “war machine” , it immediately reminded me of Halliburton and its strong influence in the Iraq war. Let’s not forget that during this time period we had some of the most aggressive politicians in office, men like Rumsfeld Cheney who provided the real protagonists against the backdrop of this movie and thus made it more believable. In terms of Lansbury’s version and Meryl’s, I felt that the revisionist view of a power grabbing senator although more overt than lansbury’s characterization, was the real engine for the movie. Meryl yet once again created a character that was different and complex. I really liked this version of the movie much better than the first. Just my opinion.

  • chloe

    Her Honor,Meryl Streep brought dignity & sensibleness to her character as Ellie Shaw

  • Marc

    Another powerful performance by Meryl.

  • Sonja

    I have seen the original film of 1962 and in all honesty… I didn’t like it as much as I like this movie.
    Though I can understand why it was highly regarded at that time, the fear of communism and so on.
    Though today, the power of global industries is much more frightening and it just fits in the movie. It left me goosebumps everywhere when I saw it. This was just not a fantasy in my opinion. It really made me think this could or might even be happening today….
    Anyway, both versions of the mother were pure brilliance in their dimensions.
    Meryl’s Ellie is the most evil character she has ever played. I could feel something for characters like Mary Fisher, Madeleine Ashton, Lindy Chamberlain, Miranda Priestly or Sister Aloysius…. yes, even Margaret Thatcher.
    Though MT and her have as politicians more in common. But I felt Ellie was more greedy to get power than MT and the use of her own (strangely TOO muched beloved) son is the best example.
    It’s still fascinating, nevertheless, this role of Eleanor Prentiss-Shaw. Yes, it’s more played directly ( I mean the minute you see her the first time you just know what she’s up to-she doesn’t hide it) than the role Angela Lansbury played (and she really should have won for that, no question), but still shows the strenght of this character, that holds secretly the strings in her hands in the cruel game called “politics”.
    It’s, for me, a very good political thriller. One I can watch over and over again.

  • Charlie

    I loved Meryl in this, she was a ball of energy and brought a whole new spin to an infamous character